{"action":"create","ckan_id":null,"date_created":"Sat, 31 Jan 2026 20:48:22 GMT","date_finished":null,"harvest_job_id":"be663794-03e4-477f-b829-14d6c674504e","harvest_source_id":"31f41541-38a0-400b-b240-10ebcb0acd9a","id":"afe0341c-f326-4b90-8621-331a38b12cfd","identifier":"https://dggs.alaska.gov/webpubs/metadata/RDF2016-5.xml","parent_identifier":null,"source_hash":"5d1f8dbdac87c81e66d58958c62163be46525a2a2b7a372b98d94acdb48f196d","source_raw":"\n\n\n\n\nFreeman, L.K.\nGillis, R.J.\nElliott, B.A.\nWypych, Alicja\n2016\nMajor-oxide and trace-element geochemical data from rocks collected in 2010 in the Tyonek Quadrangle, Alaska\nreport and digital data\n\nRaw Data File\nRDF 2016-5\n\n\nFairbanks, Alaska, United States\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\n\n2 p.\nhttp://dx.doi.org/10.14509/29651\n\n\n\nCook Inlet has been recognized as the second-largest petroleum province in Alaska, second only to the North Slope. The south-central Tyonek Quadrangle is an area of significant geologic interest because it is the only location in Cook Inlet where the entire producing stratigraphy of the basin is exposed on the surface. Additionally, this area encompasses the structural boundary between the forearc basin and its sediment source rocks. To better understand the petroleum system and the geologic relationships between the exhumed arc intrusive rocks and adjacent Cenozoic stratigraphy of the Cook Inlet forearc basin, during the summer of 2010 the Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys conducted a federally-funded geologic field mapping project. As a part of this project DGGS collected 44 rock samples for geochemical analyses from Late Cretaceous and Paleogene intrusive and volcanic lithologies that compose part of the Alaska-Aleutian Range batholith and arc. Major-oxide, minor-oxide, and trace-element geochemical data presented here provide new information about the genesis and potential mineralization of igneous rocks in the western Neacola and southern Tordrillo mountains. The analytical data tables associated with this report are available in digital format as comma-separated value (CSV) files.\nTo better understand the petroleum system and the geologic relationships between the exhumed arc intrusive rocks and adjacent Cenozoic stratigraphy of the Cook Inlet forearc basin, during the summer of 2010 the Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys conducted a federally-funded geologic field mapping project. As a part of this project DGGS collected 44 rock samples for geochemical analyses from Late Cretaceous and Paleogene intrusive and volcanic lithologies that compose part of the Alaska-Aleutian Range batholith and arc. Major-oxide, minor-oxide, and trace-element geochemical data presented here provide new information about the genesis and potential mineralization of igneous rocks in the western Neacola and southern Tordrillo mountains.\n\n>border: Outline of the study area.\n>rock-major-oxide-trace-element: Major- and minor-oxide and trace-element analysis of rock samples\n\n\n\n\n\n2010\n2016\n\n\npublication date\n\n\ncomplete\nNone planned\n\n\n\n-152.251156\n-151.399486\n61.343356\n61.007156\n\n\n\n\nISO 19115 Topic Category\ngeoscientificInformation\n\n\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\nAnalyses\nAnalyses and Sampling\nAnalytical Lab Results\nAnalytical Results\nBedrock\nBedrock Geology\nChemistry\nExploration\nGeochemical Data\nGeochemical Surveys\nGeochemistry\nGeology\nIgneous\nIgneous Rocks\nLab Methods\nMagmatic Arc\nMajor Oxides\nMinor Oxides\nPetrology\nResources\nRocks\nSTATEMAP Project\nSample Location\nTrace Elements\nTrace Geochemical\nVolcanic\nVolcanic Arc\nVolcanic Rocks\n\n\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\nAlaska Range\nCook Inlet\nCook Inlet Basin\nNeacola Mountains\nTordrillo Mountains\nTyonek\nTyonek Quadrangle\n\n\nThis report, map, and/or dataset is available directly from the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (see contact information below).\nAny hard copies or published datasets utilizing these datasets shall clearly indicate their source. If the user has modified the data in any way, the user is obligated to describe the types of modifications the user has made. The user specifically agrees not to misrepresent these datasets, nor to imply that changes made by the user were approved by the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys. The State of Alaska makes no express or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.\n\n\n\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\n\nGIS Manager\n\nmailing and physical\n
3354 College Road
\nFairbanks\nAK\n99709-3707\nUSA\n\n(907)451-5020\ndggsgis@alaska.gov\n8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays\n\n\nPrimary funding for the Tyonek work was provided by the State of Alaska. Geologic mapping during the 2010 field season was supported by the U.S. Geological Survey's National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (STATEMAP award number: G10AC00321).\n\n\nHerriott, T.M.\nNye, C.J.\nReger, R.D.\nWartes, M.A.\nLePain, D.L.\nGillis, R.J.\n2014\nGeologic context, age constraints, and sedimentology of a Pleistocene volcaniclastic succession near Mount Spurr volcano, south-central Alaska\n\nReport of Investigation\nRI 2014-2\n\n\nFairbanks, Alaska, United States\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\n\n35 p\nhttp://dx.doi.org/10.14509/27261\n\n\n\n\nSolie, D.N.\nWerdon, M.B.\nNye, C.J.\nCombellick, R.A.\n1993\nLand selection unit 6 (Tyonek Quadrangle): References, DGGS sample locations, geochemical and major oxide data\n\nPublic Data File\nPDF 93-6\n\n\nFairbanks, Alaska, United States\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\n\n11 p\nhttp://dx.doi.org/10.14509/1555\n\n\n\n\nSolie, D.N.\nWerdon, M.B.\nNye, C.J.\nCombellick, R.A.\n1993\nLand selection unit 7 (Tyonek and Kenai quadrangles): References, DGGS sample location, geochemical and major oxide data\n\nPublic Data File\nPDF 93-7\n\n\nFairbanks, Alaska, United States\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\n\n11 p\nhttp://dx.doi.org/10.14509/1556\n\n\n\n\n\nCoordinates of sample locations were determined by the geologists in the field using using hand-held GPS devices. Sample numbers were recorded in the field on sample bags and on field note sheets. The sample location tables were plotted in GIS software to visually verify location accuracy and cross checked for consistency against the sample numbers recorded on the bags. In addition to ALS Minerals' accredited (ISO/IEC 17025-2005) internal quality-control program, DGGS monitored analysis quality with one standard reference material per batch. Lab results were examined by the DGGS geologists to ensure that they are reasonable given the geologic context of the sample.\n\nnot applicable\nThis data release is complete. The data tables have been lightly edited for clarity, but are generally provided as received from the lab.\n\n\nLocation data were collected with handheld GPS devices, with location accuracy error typically less than 10 meters.\n\n\n\n\nSample selection - Igneous rocks showing little alteration or weathering were collected for whole-rock major-oxide, minor-oxide, and trace-element analyses to aid in classification and study of petrogenesis and tectonic setting. Most samples are 'grab'' samples, which were collected for their overall representation of the outcrop.\n2010\n\n\nSample preparation - Rock samples were processed by ALS Minerals using their CRU-31, SPL-21, and PUL-31 methods. The samples were crushed to better than 70 percent passing 2 mm, and a 250 g split was pulverized to better than 85 percent passing 75 microns. Prior to crushing, samples for whole-rock analysis were trimmed by DGGS staff to remove weathered surfaces.\n2010\n\n\n\nWhole-rock geochemistry - Samples were analyzed for a variety of suites of major and trace elements depending on the sample type. In addition to relying on ALS Minerals' accredited (ISO/IEC 17025-2005) internal quality-control program, DGGS monitored analysis quality with one standard reference material per batch of 20 analyses.\nFor whole-rock geochemistry samples, major and minor oxides were analyzed using lithium metaborate fusion digestion and XRF (ALS Minerals method ME-XRF06). Trace elements were determined using XRF on powder pellets (ALS Minerals method ME-XRF05).\n\n2011\n\n\n\n\npoint\n\n\n\n\n.000001\n.000001\ndecimal degrees\n\n\nNorth American Datum of 1927\nClarke 1866\n6378206.4\n294.9786982\n\n\n\n\n\n\nrdf2016-5-border.shp\nOutline of the study area.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\nborder\n\n\n\n\nrdf2016-5-rock-major-oxide-trace-element.csv, rdf2016-5-rock-major-oxide-trace-element-limits.csv\nMajor- and minor-oxide and trace-element analysis of rock samples.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\nrock-major-oxide-trace-element\n\n\nSAMPLE\nLabel assigned to identify the sample.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\n\nGeneric example of a sample identifier: YYAAA9999X: YY=last two digits of year, AAA=geologist's initials (one to three characters), 9999=unique station number, X= optional alpha character which indicates that multiple samples were collected at a given location or that multiple observations were recorded in the project database.\n\n\n\nBATCH_NUMBER\nNumber provided by the laboratory to identify the samples and analyses included in the work order.\nALS Minerals\n\nFA11083196\n\n\n\nLONGITUDE\nLongitude, NAD27\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\n\n\n-152.221411\n-151.429439\ndecimal degrees\n\n\n\n\nLATITUDE\nLatitude, NAD27\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\n\n\n61.021598\n61.328914\ndecimal degrees\n\n\n\n\nSAMPLE_MATERIAL\nType of material that was sent to the lab for processing.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\n\nrock\n\n\n\nCOLLECTOR\nThe geologist who collected the sample.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\n\nThe samples presented in this report were collected by: Brent Elliott, and Larry Freeman\n\n\n\nDESCRIPTION\nDescription of the sample\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\n\nCharacters 1 to 254 of a brief sample or station description.\n\n\n\nDESCRIP_2\nExtension of the sample or station description for descriptions which are greater than 254 characters in length\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\n\nCharacters greater than 254 of the sample or station description.\n\n\n\nNULL\nThe descriptive text is shorter than 254 characters.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\n\n\n\n\nWEIGHT_KG\nSample weight (as received by the lab) in kilograms\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and ALS Minerals\n\n\n0.45\n5.55\nkilograms\n\n\n\n\nAs_ppm_ME-XRF05\nArsenic values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 5 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 5000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n5\n22\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nBa_ppm_ME-XRF05\nBarium values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 10 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n170\n2700\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nBi_ppm_ME-XRF05\nBismuth values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 4 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n5\n8\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nCe_ppm_ME-XRF05\nCerium values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 10 parts per million; Upper detection limit = parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n-1\nBelow detection limit.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and ALS Minerals\n\n\n\n\n10\n80\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nCr_ppm_ME-XRF05\nChromium values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 5 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n-1\nBelow detection limit.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and ALS Minerals\n\n\n\n\n5\n208\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nCu_ppm_ME-XRF05\nCopper values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 10 parts per million; Upper detection limit = parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n-1\nBelow detection limit.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and ALS Minerals\n\n\n\n\n10\n290\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nGa_ppm_ME-XRF05\nGallium values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 4 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n16\n24\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nLa_ppm_ME-XRF05\nLanthanum values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 10 parts per million; Upper detection limit = parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n-1\nBelow detection limit.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and ALS Minerals\n\n\n\n\n10\n30\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nMo_ppm_ME-XRF05\nMolybdenum values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 4 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n-1\nBelow detection limit.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and ALS Minerals\n\n\n\n\n4\n4\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nNb_ppm_ME-XRF05\nNiobium values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 2 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n2\n23\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nNi_ppm_ME-XRF05\nNickel values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 10 parts per million; Upper detection limit = parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n-1\nBelow detection limit.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and ALS Minerals\n\n\n\n\n10\n120\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nPb_ppm_ME-XRF05\nLead values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 4 parts per million; Upper detection limit = parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n7\n23\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nRb_ppm_ME-XRF05\nRubidium values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 2 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n7\n166\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nSb_ppm_ME-XRF05\nAntimony values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 4 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n-1\nBelow detection limit.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and ALS Minerals\n\n\n\n\nSe_ppm_ME-XRF05\nSelenium values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 2 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n-1\nBelow detection limit.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and ALS Minerals\n\n\n\n\n2\n2\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nSn_ppm_ME-XRF05\nTin values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 5 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n-1\nBelow detection limit.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and ALS Minerals\n\n\n\n\nSr_ppm_ME-XRF05\nStrontium values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 2 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n53\n1965\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nTa_ppm_ME-XRF05\nTantalum values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 10 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n-1\nBelow detection limit.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and ALS Minerals\n\n\n\n\nTh_ppm_ME-XRF05\nThorium values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 4 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n7\n39\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nTi_ppm_ME-XRF05\nTitanium values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 5 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n319\n>10000\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nU_ppm_ME-XRF05\nUranium values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 4 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n4\n9\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nW_ppm_ME-XRF05\nTungsten values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 10 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n-1\nBelow detection limit.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and ALS Minerals\n\n\n\n\n10\n10\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nY_ppm_ME-XRF05\nYttrium values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 2 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n6\n47\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nZr_ppm_ME-XRF05\nZirconium values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 2 parts per million; Upper detection limit = 10000 parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n46\n279\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nZn_ppm_ME-XRF05\nZinc values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 10 parts per million; Upper detection limit = parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n10\n140\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nV_ppm_ME-XRF05\nVanadium values measured in parts per million; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Pressed Pellet; Lower detection limit = 10 parts per million; Upper detection limit = parts per million; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n-1\nBelow detection limit.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and ALS Minerals\n\n\n\n\n20\n570\nparts per million\n\n\n\n\nSiO2_pct_ME-XRF06\nSilicon dioxide values measured in percent; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Lithium Borate Fusion; Lower detection limit = 0.01 percent; Upper detection limit = 100 percent; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n44.37\n75.33\npercent\n\n\n\n\nAl2O3_pct_ME-XRF06\nAluminum oxide values measured in percent; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Lithium Borate Fusion; Lower detection limit = 0.01 percent; Upper detection limit = 100 percent; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n11.72\n19.26\npercent\n\n\n\n\nFe2O3_pct_ME-XRF06\nIron oxide (+3) values measured in percent; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Lithium Borate Fusion; Lower detection limit = 0.01 percent; Upper detection limit = 100 percent; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n1.28\n16.97\npercent\n\n\n\n\nCaO_pct_ME-XRF06\nCalcium oxide values measured in percent; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Lithium Borate Fusion; Lower detection limit = 0.01 percent; Upper detection limit = 100 percent; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n0.56\n13.68\npercent\n\n\n\n\nMgO_pct_ME-XRF06\nMagnesium oxide values measured in percent; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Lithium Borate Fusion; Lower detection limit = 0.01 percent; Upper detection limit = 100 percent; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n0.18\n8.25\npercent\n\n\n\n\nNa2O_pct_ME-XRF06\nSodium oxide values measured in percent; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Lithium Borate Fusion; Lower detection limit = 0.01 percent; Upper detection limit = 100 percent; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n1.52\n4.64\npercent\n\n\n\n\nK2O_pct_ME-XRF06\nPotassium oxide values measured in percent; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Lithium Borate Fusion; Lower detection limit = 0.01 percent; Upper detection limit = 100 percent; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n0.44\n8.54\npercent\n\n\n\n\nCr2O3_pct_ME-XRF06\nChromium oxide values measured in percent; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Lithium Borate Fusion; Lower detection limit = 0.01 percent; Upper detection limit = 100 percent; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n-1\nBelow detection limit.\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and ALS Minerals\n\n\n\n\n0.01\n0.04\npercent\n\n\n\n\nTiO2_pct_ME-XRF06\nTitanium dioxide values measured in percent; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Lithium Borate Fusion; Lower detection limit = 0.01 percent; Upper detection limit = 100 percent; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n0.07\n3.7\npercent\n\n\n\n\nMnO_pct_ME-XRF06\nManganese oxide values measured in percent; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Lithium Borate Fusion; Lower detection limit = 0.01 percent; Upper detection limit = 100 percent; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n0.03\n0.24\npercent\n\n\n\n\nP2O5_pct_ME-XRF06\nPhosphorus oxide values measured in percent; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Lithium Borate Fusion; Lower detection limit = 0.01 percent; Upper detection limit = 100 percent; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n0.005\n0.805\npercent\n\n\n\n\nSrO_pct_ME-XRF06\nStrontium oxide values measured in percent; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Lithium Borate Fusion; Lower detection limit = 0.01 percent; Upper detection limit = 100 percent; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n0.01\n0.18\npercent\n\n\n\n\nBaO_pct_ME-XRF06\nBarium oxide values measured in percent; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Lithium Borate Fusion; Lower detection limit = 0.01 percent; Upper detection limit = 100 percent; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n0.01\n0.31\npercent\n\n\n\n\nLOI_pct_ME-XRF06\nLoss on Ignition values measured in percent; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Lithium Borate Fusion; Lower detection limit = 0.01 percent; Upper detection limit = 100 percent; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n0.19\n4.79\npercent\n\n\n\n\nTotal_pct_ME-XRF06\nTotal values measured in percent; Method: X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), Lithium Borate Fusion; Lower detection limit = 0.01 percent; Upper detection limit = 101 percent; Detection limits indicate the minimum and maximum concentrations that can be accurately determined.\nALS Minerals\n\n\n98.08\n99.9\npercent\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\n\n\nmailing and physical\n
3354 College Road
\nFairbanks\nAK\n99709-3707\nUSA\n\n(907)451-5020\n(907)451-5050\ndggspubs@alaska.gov\n8 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except State holidays\nPlease view our website (http://www.dggs.alaska.gov) for the latest information on available data. Please contact us using the e-mail address provided above when possible.\n\n\nRDF 2016-5\nThe State of Alaska makes no expressed or implied warranties (including warranties for merchantability and fitness) with respect to the character, functions, or capabilities of the electronic data or products or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. In no event will the State of Alaska be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, consequential, or other damages suffered by the user or any other person or entity whether from the use of the electronic services or products or any failure thereof or otherwise. In no event will the State of Alaska's liability to the Requestor or anyone else exceed the fee paid for the electronic service or product.\n\nDGGS publications are available as free online downloads or you may purchase paper hard-copies or digital files on CD/DVD or other digital storage media by mail, phone, fax, or email from the DGGS Fairbanks office. To purchase this or other printed reports and maps, contact DGGS by phone (907-451-5020), e-mail (dggspubs@alaska.gov), or fax (907-451-5050). Payment accepted: Cash, check, money order, VISA, or MasterCard. Turnaround time is 1-2 weeks unless special arrangements are made and an express fee is paid. Shipping charge will be the actual cost of postage and will be added to the total amount due. Contact us for the exact shipping amount.\nContact DGGS for current pricing\n\n\n\n\nASCII tabular files\n\n\n\n\n\nhttp://dx.doi.org/10.14509/29651\n\n\n\n\n\nFree download\n\n\n\n20160401\n\n\n\nAlaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys\n\nMetadata Manager\n\nmailing and physical\n
3354 College Road
\nFairbanks\nAK\n99709-3707\nUSA\n\n(907)451-5020\n\n\nFGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata\nFGDC-STD-001-1998\nIf the user has modified the data in any way they are obligated to describe the types of modifications they have performed in the supporting metadata file. User specifically agrees not to imply that changes they made were approved by the Alaska Department of Natural Resources or Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys.\n\nhttp://www.dggs.alaska.gov/metadata/dggs.ext\ndggs metadata extensions\n\n\n\n","source_transform":null,"status":"error"}